/> a mother's heart » Blog Archive » vision forum, patriarchy, and FLDS? oh my! part 7

I have been studying, reading, and contemplating this series for a few weeks now, and despite my nervousness at publishing it, I think it’s an important topic.  I include it on my blog because this group is infiltrating homeschooling communities across the country and not representing themselves accurately Biblically.  Please feel free to comment; if you disagree with me, that’s fine – but keep your comments clean, polite, and respectful.  Those who don’t will find their comments deleted at my discretion.  –Sue

If you’re new here and want to start at the beginning of this series, start reading here.

Patriarchy

Patriarchy is a model which says the man (husband) is the head of the household to the exclusion of all other family members.  It takes the Biblical concept of “headship” and expands on it to Old Testament levels, saying that the husband is worthy of being called “lord” and that his wife and children exist to serve him.  Not that the family unit is designed to work together for love and commitment and to serve God, but that they are to serve him.  It’s Selfishness 101, justified with an Old Testament framework that refuses to consider Philippians 2 as the model of serving each other in love.

Additionally, VF theology demands that women not have any spiritual authority – they are permitted to teach each other and young children, but even as their boys “age out” and become young men, the mothers aren’t considered “worthy” to teach spiritual principles or correct their growing sons.  I cannot imagine being so constrained that I didn’t have authority to teach my son as he grew – and yet, this is common.

Within this framework, women are definitely second-class citizens, and the lack of interest in educating girls/women takes on a whole new significance.

Marriage

No one gets married with the idea that it’s going to be a limited-time engagement.  No one actively lobbies for divorce or harbours the idea that divorce is easy, fun, or emotionally-edifying.  I firmly believe that the divorce rate is what it is today because the majority of us are woefully under-educated in how to keep a marriage together through the tough times.  In the good times, it’s hard to maintain real-life relationships that can steady us through rough waters; without those relationships in place, it’s particularly tough to find strength or anchor in the choppy seas of marital conflict.  Life isn’t meant to be lived alone – in a community, we can support each other and learn from each other on how to make our marriages work.

However, as a future marriage-therapist, I will say that no one worth his or her salt in marriage & family therapy would EVER suggest that marital problems are entirely the fault of one party.

And yet, VF/IBLP (like the FLDS) say that it’s always the fault of the wife.  Always.

This rankles me more than I can rightly express.  Pieces of my life have come back in to focus as I’ve studied and talked about this group.  There was a point in my past when I did an online study with a woman who purported to be my “mentor,” and we worked through The Excellent Wife by Martha Peace.  The book had many of these principles in it – every problem in my marriage was my fault, despite the fact that most of the things we were dealing with were issues LONG before I even met my husband.  One friend asked me why I was continuing the study if it bothered me so much, and my only answer was, “I’m not a quitter.  Maybe the book gets better…?”  It didn’t and I should’ve had the guts to quit the program and move on long before it was over.

Was I completely faultless in our marriage?  No, but my reactions were to things that were far beyond the scope of “just be a submissive wife and let your husband do what he wants.”  I don’t really believe than any marriage is ever fixed with those words – it just sweeps the issues under the rug and the couple then gets to dance on the edge of rug as the nameless lump in the middle gets larger through the years.

According to this theology, it doesn’t matter if the husband in the patriarchal marriage comes with tons of baggage, a history of abuse (sexual, emotional, verbal, or physical), it’s ALWAYS the wife’s fault for tension in the relationship.  It doesn’t matter if the husband demands that his wife be pregnant and raise 12 children and then doesn’t lift a finger to help with the family’s needs or chores around the house – it’s her fault for not being able to maintain the household, absorb the stress, and then be a willing and coy sexual partner.

the last installment in this series is here

Related Posts with Thumbnails
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
  • RiAnnon

    Sue, I really liked your post today and am going to read a couple of others. :) I did want to comment on what I think is the misbelief that patriarchy is the Old Testament model of family. I have been studying back through things in the Old Testament and from a Hebraic understanding of the scriptures. It has been eye-opening to learn that this isn’t really the case, but the case of misinterpretation of the scriptures over time and interpreters not understanding the true Hebraic understanding. Someone you might find it very interesting to chat with about this is a woman named Crystal Lutton at http://www.aolff.org . Anyway, just some thoughts I had as I was reading. :)

    Ri

  • http://www.mamasheartblog.com sue

    Thanks for the feedback, Ri. I”ll look in to your connection and do more reading; I do agree that most of patriarchy does tend to be a mis-application of OT practices. One thing that I didn’t have space to delve in to is that God worked in the lives of the OT “heroes of faith” (as per Heb. 11) as they were. IOW, they were pagans, called out of a pagan existence. God didn’t change them all at once to make them someone different – He grew them a little at a time and worked in their (present) existence for His glory and their growth.

    For me, this is an important aspect – Abram was called in to faith *in spite of* his polygamous background. His polygamy was never praised, and in fact, it caused strife for his family and for untold generations, even through today. The FLDS misapply and say that because Abraham was polygamous, it’s ok now. The same sort of misapplications exist in patriarchal cultures that seek to justify their beliefs with OT scripture.

    Anyhow, there’s more, but this comment is already too long. 😉 Thanks for reading and commenting! :)

  • Pingback: Series about Vision Forum | Why Not Train A Child?()